Campus Action Plan

2025-2026 Law Elementary Action Plan
Principal Shankle
Law Elementary School Action Plan Template
|
KEY ACTION ONE |
Key Action Teachers will implement the 2nd Teach (Intervention) framework daily to strengthen Tier I High-Quality Instruction and improve student performance in Reading and Writing (3rd-5th Grade). |
|
Indicators of success (Measurable results that describe success.) |
|
|
· By December 2025, 75% of teachers will effectively implement the RACE strategy to support instruction for Short Constructed Responses (SCRs) and Extended Constructed Responses (ECRs). · By December 2025, 5% of scholars will score at the Meets or Masters level on Reading Unit Assessments, as tracked in the OnTrack data system, with an increase to 10% Meets by Spring 2026. · By December 2025, 20% of teachers will demonstrate at least 20% of students performing at Proficient or higher on Daily Exit Tickets (DOLs), with a targeted increase to 25% by May 2026, as measured by the campus DOL data tracker. · By December 2025, 50% of teachers will achieve an average score of at least 7 on SPOT observations, as measured by the SPOT rubric administered by the Instructional Leadership Team (ILT), with an increase to 9 by April 2026. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific actions – Campus Administration Team · Campus leaders will model and provide weekly feedback on lesson plans—including DOLs and slide decks—using the Sweet 16 Instructional Practices framework. · Campus leaders will facilitate weekly Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) to support lesson internalization, guided by the Lesson Internalization Protocol and the Weekly DOL Data Tracker. · Campus leaders will conduct weekly on-the-spot coaching for teachers, apprentices, and learning coaches using the SPOT observation form. · Campus leaders will engage in daily morning calibration walks to identify instructional trends and misalignments, utilizing the SPOT form for consistency. · Campus leaders will coach the effective implementation of ECRs and SCRs by supporting teachers in developing strong exemplars and analyzing student work artifacts for alignment and rigor.
|
|
|
Specific actions – staff (What specific action steps will the staff take to accomplish the objective?) · Instructional Staff will internalize the district’s curriculum and annotate the LSAE instructional materials to ensure alignment and accuracy with delivering high-quality instruction. · Instructional Staff will actively engage in ongoing professional development opportunities that support lesson internalization, classroom culture, and data-driven instructional decisions. · Instructional Staff will actively engage in weekly data-driven PLCS that adhere to the Campus Based PLC protocol. · Instructional Staff will practice the following week’s lesson during weekly DEMO days every Thursday from 4:15-5:15 p.m. · Instructional Staff will implement writing MRS throughout the direct instruction and incorporate three SCRs per lesson with supports using sentence stems, cognates, and visual aids. |
|
|
Key Action One: Improve Instructional Quality & Capacity |
||
|
Staff Devel. |
Who: Campus Teachers |
||
|
What: Improve the instructional quality and capacity of the teaching staff at Law Elementary to meet the diverse learning needs of our students by delivering high-leveraged Tier I instruction which will result in higher student achievement and growth. |
|||
|
When: Ongoing |
|||
|
Where: Law Elementary |
|||
|
Budget |
Proposed item |
Description |
Amount |
|
Staff development |
District Provided PD, Leadership Development Trainings |
$0 |
|
|
Materials/resources |
Blueprints for Instructional Brillance , Data Binder, Pacing calendars (in binders) |
|
|
|
Purchased services |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
||
|
Funding sources: Campus Budget |
|||
|
KEY ACTION TWO |
Key Action (Briefly state the specific goal or objective.) All ARD meetings for scholars with IEPs will be scheduled and conducted in compliance with required timelines. The Principal and/or Assistant Principal will actively participate in each ARD meeting to ensure appropriate support, services, and instructional decisions are made for every student. |
|
Indicators of success (Measurable results that describe success.) |
|
|
· By the end of the first semester, 100% of campus ARDs are held on or before the deadline. · Ensure that 100% of newly enrolled scholars with IEPs will have information verified and accurately reflected in the ARD tracker within one week of their enrollment, with bi-weekly checks to monitor accuracy. · The principal/assistant principal will ensure timely and full attendance at 100% of ARD meetings, actively participating in discussions to enhance student support as evidenced by the ARD minutes and ARD participation. |
|
|
Specific actions – school leaders (What specific action steps will the building leaders take to accomplish the objective?)
|
|
|
· Campus Leaders will monitor the Campus Compliance Dashboard in EasyIEP. · Campus Leaders will review records of newly enrolled students and begin services if the student has an IEP. · Campus Leaders will maintain campus ARD tracker to ensure all ARDs are held on time and with required members. · Campus Leaders will develop a tracking tool for teachers and students to track student data and progress regularly as measured by the daily DOL and LSAE exemplars. · Campus Leaders will collaborate with teachers during PLC to discuss data and interventions for individual students as measured by weekly data collections of monthly unit assessments. · Campus Leaders will utilize resources to support teacher content-knowledge, rigor, and depth of TEKS, and student engagement as measured by the T-TESS rubric and TES expectations. · Campus Leaders will be well-informed of district curriculum, assessment schedules, school data, district pivots, current trends, and research as measured by the South Division Weekly Insider.
|
|
|
Specific actions – staff (What specific action steps will the staff take to accomplish the objective?) · Instructional Staff will conduct data conferences with leaders and colleagues: Share student work samples, assessment data folders (organization, usage, maintenance) and assessment data projections as measured by Campus Based PLC Protocol. · Instructional Staff will engage in reflective practices that connect student growth and achievement to the impact on professional teaching goals, department goals, and school goals, collectively as measured by NWEA and monthly unit assessments. · Instructional Staff will Maintain data binders and all tracking tools regularly as measured by the Ontrack reporting system. · Instructional Staff will utilize data to drive targeted intervention and monitor regularly as measured by the exemplar created by the teacher. · Instructional Staff will create a culture of differentiated instruction: implement differentiated instruction techniques to address the diverse learning styles and abilities within special populations as measured by the SPOT observation rubric. · Instructional Staff will provide small group instruction and one-on-one support to students in each of the subgroups who require additional assistance in math and/or reading as measured by the DOL and LSAE exemplars.
|
|
|
Key Action Two: |
||
|
Staff Devel. |
Who: Instructional Staff |
||
|
What: Implement targeted intervention aimed at closing the Math and Reading academic gaps of all subgroups (SPED, EB, and HB 1416) to decrease the achievement gap between all students. |
|||
|
When: Ongoing |
|||
|
Where: Law Elementary |
|||
|
Budget |
Proposed item |
Description |
Amount |
|
Staff development |
Pre-service and monthly PD sessions that support high-quality instructional practices for Special Populations. |
$0 |
|
|
Materials/resources |
Manuals, exemplars, slide decks, SPOT observation forms, T-TESS Rubric, IEPs |
$0 |
|
|
Purchased services |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
||
|
Funding sources: |
|||
|
KEY ACTION THREE |
Key Action (Briefly state the specific goal or objective.) Teachers will implement the LSAE framework daily to increase Tier I HQI and student performance in Mathematics. |
|
Indicators of success (Measurable results that describe success.) |
|
|
· By December 2025, 5% of scholars will achieve Meets on Unit assessments on open-ended questions utilizing the OnTrack data system and increase to 8% in Meets by Spring 2026. · Students will demonstrate mastery of the learning objective and demonstrate growth by 20% by October 2025, and that percentage will increase by 50% by February 2026, and the percentage will increase to 70% by May 2026 as measured by daily D.O.L in the OnTrack platform. · By December 2025, 30% of teachers will have a rate of 10% of scholars reporting to the Team Center after leveling up from Tier 1 instruction, while increasing to at least 15% in May 2026 as measured by the DOL and assessment data tracker. · By January 2026, 70% of teachers will have an average score of at least 7 on their SPOT observations as measured by the spot observation rubric administered by the ILT and increase to 9 in April 2026. |
|
|
Specific actions – school leaders (What specific action steps will the building leaders take to accomplish the objective?) |
|
|
· Campus Leaders will model and conduct weekly feedback on lesson plans (DOLs, slide decks, LSAE) utilizing the “Sweet 16” expectations. · Campus Leaders will lead weekly PLCs to provide explicit support for lesson internalization utilizing the Lesson Internalization Protocol and weekly DOL data tracker. · Campus Leaders will conduct weekly on the spot coaching to teachers, apprentices, and learning coaches utilizing the SPOT form. · Campus leaders will calibrate every morning to identify trends of misalignment utilizing the SPOT form. · Campus leaders will coach ECR and SCR effective implementation by developing teacher’s exemplar and comparing student’s artifacts. |
|
|
Specific actions – staff (What specific action steps will the staff take to accomplish the objective?) · Instructional Staff will implement a data tracking system within their classroom to guide their instructional decisions as measured by the DOL and LSAE exemplar. · Instructional Staff will participate in various trainings, professional development, and PLCs (Professional Learning Communities) to augment their expertise and proficiency in implementing effective literacy instructional strategies as measured by the Campus Based PLC Protocol. · Instructional Staff will implement identified structures to ensure that the leveled push out process happens with fidelity as measured by the framework of the NES model. |
|
|
Key Action Three: |
||
|
Staff Devel. |
Who: Instructional Staff |
||
|
What: Teachers will faithfully implement the LSAE framework daily, except for Flex Fridays.
|
|||
|
When: Ongoing |
|||
|
Where: Law Elementary |
|||
|
Budget |
Proposed item |
Description |
Amount |
|
Staff development |
LSAE Professional Development |
$0 |
|
|
Materials/resources |
Exemplars, annotated slide decks, Criteria of Success |
$0 |
|
|
Purchased services |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
||
|
Funding sources: |
|||
|
KEY ACTION FOUR |
Key Action (Briefly state the specific goal or objective.) Teachers will implement the LSAE framework daily to increase Tier I HQI and student performance in science. |
|
Indicators of success (Measurable results that describe success.) |
|
|
· By December 2025, 70% of the science teachers will score at least 3 in Monitor and Adjust Domain and 80% will score 4 by April 2026. · By December 2025, 75% of teachers will effectively implement the success criteria for scoring and teaching the RACE strategy for all SCRs and ECRs 85% by EOY. · By December 2025, 5% of scholars will achieve Meets on Unit assessments utilizing the OnTrack data system and increase to 10% in Meets by Spring 2026. · By December 2025, 30% of teachers will have a rate of 10% of scholars receiving a 4 out of 5 of higher on the DOL, afterleveling up from Tier 1 instruction, while increasing to at least 15% in May 2026 as measured by the DOL and data tracker. |
|
|
Specific actions – school leaders (What specific action steps will the building leaders take to accomplish the objective? |
|
|
· Campus Leaders will model and conduct weekly feedback on lesson plans (DOLs, slide decks, and campus assessments) utilizing the campus tracker · Campus Leaders will lead weekly PLCs to provide explicit support for lesson internalization utilizing the Lesson Internalization Protocol and weekly DOL data tracker. · Campus Leaders will conduct weekly on the spot coaching to teachers, apprentices, and learning coaches utilizing the SPOT form and Great 8 instructional expectations. · Campus leaders will calibrate every morning to identify trends of misalignment utilizing the SPOT form. · Campus leaders will coach ECR and SCR effective implementation by developing teacher’s exemplar and comparing student’s artifacts.
|
|
|
Specific actions – staff (What specific action steps will the staff take to accomplish the objective?) · Instructional Staff will internalize the district’s curriculum and annotate the LSAE instructional materials to ensure alignment and accuracy with delivering high-quality instruction. · Instructional Staff will actively engage in ongoing professional development opportunities that support lesson internalization, classroom culture, and data-driven instructional decisions. · Instructional Staff will actively engage in weekly data-driven PLCS that adhere to the Campus Based PLC protocol. · Instructional Staff will practice the following week’s lesson during weekly DEMO days every Thursday during PLC. · Instructional Staff will implement writing MRS throughout the direct instruction and incorporate three ECR or SCR per lesson with supports using sentence stems, cognates, and visual aids. |
|
|
Key Action Four: |
||
|
Staff Devel. |
Who: Instructional Staff |
||
|
What: All students will show sizeable achievement growth in math, reading, and science standards.
|
|||
|
When: Ongoing |
|||
|
Where: Law Elementary |
|||
|
Budget |
Proposed item |
Description |
Amount |
|
Staff development |
Data-Driven Instruction with an emphasis on high-quality instruction |
$0 |
|
|
Materials/resources |
Powerpoint presentation, NWEA student profiles, |
$0 |
|
|
Purchased services |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
||
|
Funding sources: |
|||
|
KEY ACTION FIVE |
Key Action (Briefly state the specific goal or objective.) Improve English proficiency for Emergent Bilingual scholars. |
|
Indicators of success (Measurable results that describe success.) |
|
|
· The percentage of students in grades K-5 performing at advanced and advanced high level on TELPAS Reading will increase from 31% on TELPAS 2025 to 33% on TELPAS 2026. · By 2025 PEIMS snapshot, 100% of students identified as potential EB students defined by Home Language Survey indicators are tested and appropriately coded. · Progress monitoring will be conducted through Summit K-12 program usage and assessments. |
|
|
Specific actions – school leaders (What specific action steps will the building leaders take to accomplish the objective?)
|
|
|
· Campus Leaders will pull current scholar’s composite ratings on TELPAS for 2024-2025 school year, percent of scholars who met reclassification criteria, and have the interim targe for English Language Proficiency standard internalized. · Campus Leaders will facilitate meetings to share the student-level data and goals with campus administrators, staff, and teachers. · Campus Leaders will review the EB spot form guidance document and the lesson internalization protocol with all administrators and teachers to clarify all instructional expectations, set norms, and calibrate. · Campus Leaders will identify which teachers are serving EBs during which class periods to ensure they are observing teachers during instruction for EBs by reviewing class rosters. · Campus Leaders will establish strong and clearly defined systems on respective campus for identification, enrollment, scheduling, and monitoring coding for all EB scholars. · Campus Leaders will ensure documentation, timelines, and coding align with federal and state guidelines. · Campus Leaders will review potential EB list provided by multilingual department for identifying students who need to test EB identification assessment before district snapshot date. |
|
|
Specific actions – staff (What specific action steps will the staff take to accomplish the objective?) · Instructional Staff will conduct data conferences with leaders and colleagues: Share student work samples, assessment data folders (organization, usage, maintenance) and assessment data projections as measured by Campus Based PLC Protocol. · Instructional Staff will engage in reflective practices that connect student growth and achievement to the impact on professional teaching goals, department goals, and school goals, collectively as measured by NWEA and monthly unit assessments. · Instructional Staff will Maintain data binders and all tracking tools regularly as measured by the Ontrack reporting system. · Instructional Staff will utilize data to drive targeted intervention and monitor regularly as measured by the exemplar created by the teacher. · Instructional Staff will create a culture of differentiated instruction: implement differentiated instruction techniques to address the diverse learning styles and abilities within special populations as measured by the SPOT observation rubric. · Instructional Staff will provide small group instruction and one-on-one support to EB scholars who require additional assistance in math and/or reading as measured by the DOL and assessments.
|
|
|
Key Action Two: |
||
|
Staff Devel. |
Who: Instructional Staff |
||
|
What: Implement targeted intervention aimed at closing the Math and Reading academic gaps of EB scholars. |
|||
|
When: Ongoing |
|||
|
Where: Law Elementary |
|||
|
Budget |
Proposed item |
Description |
Amount |
|
Staff development |
Pre-service and monthly PD sessions that support high-quality instructional practices for Special Populations. |
$0 |
|
|
Materials/resources |
Manuals, exemplars, powerpoint presentation, SPOT observation forms, T-TESS Rubric, IEPs |
$0 |
|
